QUANTUM GRAVITY: THE GWARAGWARA HYPOTHESIS.

Concept: Mr. Lumumba Amin

  

Publish time/date: 06:44 am, Thursday 3rd July 2025 

Calculations, verifications by Artificial Intelligence

As Einstein posited his theory of general relativity one claim he made was that there is no such thing as a force of gravity, and that it is a SpaceTime fabric being warped by mass, and that is what creates planetary orbits.

However, when I looked at his demonstration of orbits on the SpaceTime fabric, I realized quickly that in a 4D world, the deepest point of the gravitational well generated by a mass would have to be at the center of gravity of that mass which is supposedly warping SpaceTime, thus, not only making the gravitational well cancel itself out as a phenomena, it also cancels out any possibility of the SpaceTime fabric being warped around the same mass.

(Photo: SpaceTime fabric being warped by earth. If the dip depicted a gravitational well which objects would fall towards, then the deepest part of the well should be at the center of gravity of the earth, and thereby the fall and the well would not exist in 4D reality.)

A predisposition of the SpaceTime gravitational well culminating at the center of gravity of a mass would mean that SpaceTime exists in mass just like it exists in a vacuum. But we know that this is not true because inside earth for example, time is actually warped at the center of gravity of earth, making time tick slightly slower at that position.

This proves that SpaceTime is not one, but two different elements existing concurrently but existing separately in the universe as they are affected differently by fundamental gravitational forces.

In the case of the other two Einstein phenomena (SpaceTime fabric warping around mass, and SpaceTime gravitational well of the same mass), these two phenomena cannot physically exist concurrently in a same mass simply because one operates as gravity while the other as gravitatiknal.potential yet SpaceTime is one product suposedly having one function yet here gravutational potential cancels itself out mathematically in 4D reality, and even if it didn't, it would then be in a position where its action cancels out the phenomena of SpaceTime fabric warping around the earth to produce orbiting of the moon for examole. Basically, the SpaceTime gravitational well of a mass cannot exist where the same SpaceTime fabric is actually warped around the same mass, and vice-versa.

Thus, Einsteins SpaceTime simply can not exist as one fabric, and it also cannot exist concurrently as both a gravitational well and a warping around mass, leaving the force of gravity, as explained by Sir Isaac Newton, as the only remaining mathematical explanation for celestial orbits, falls and G- forces.

(AI photo: Sir Isaac Newton facing Albert Einstein in thevchallenge for ohysics supremacy

Furthermore, the international scientific community, including the most reknown scientists, might not remember that when Newton published his findings on the phenomenon of gravity in 1687, he was already knocking out Albert Einstein even before Einstein was born.

All scientists understand tidal locking, the phenomenon explained by the differential gravitational force between a celestial body and its orbiting satellite, both rotating around their common center of gravity.

Interestingly, that phenomenon can only be mathematically explained by the Newtonian physics, particularly the effects of the gravitational pull, and not Albert Einsteins general relativity which posits that "the warping of the SpaceTime fabric around mass creates orbital movements".

Einsteins hypothesis cannot mathematically account for tidal locking, yet this phenomena, also known as gravitational locking, can account for all orbital movements of celestial systems, including the capacity of gravitational locking to slowly bring the rotation of satellites to a standstill (e.g. one side of the moon permanently facing the earth).

This slowing of the moons rotation on its own axis to a standstill yet the moon is in the vacuum of space, is scientific proof that gravity is actually a force acting on satellite orbital movements, contrary to reknown physicist Albert Einsteins theory of general relativity which claims that gravity doesn't exist. And because energy has to be transferred somewhere, it is the earth that has probably stolen by remote, through tidal locking, the Moon's previous rotation on its own axis, and is also now keeping one side of the moon permanently facing the earth through gravitational locking.

Therefore Einsteins hypothesis of the so-called "curvature of SpaceTime determining orbits" is actually just a wonderful figment of his fertile imagination. No fabric of time and space alone can create the physics phenomena known as center of gravity.

The lock itself is a pulling force that is happening in the vacuum of space (the common center of gravity), and because the moon is distancing itself ever so slightly from the earth (at about 1.5 inches annually), it means that the rotation of the moon around the earth is slightly above escape volacity from both the gravitational pull of the earth and the moon around each other, and the two around the sun. This rotstional web is straining, and ultimately undoing the gravitational lock that traps the moon to the Earth's rotation around the sun.

Only Newtonian physics can mathematically tell the full story of the rotation of two celestial bodies around a common center of gravity, and the phenomena of the gravotational lock bewithin a system contsining a star snd the multiple planets and their moons, all revolving around that star. And if gravity didn't exist as a force, both centre of gravity and the quantum gravitational lock of the universe wouldn't exist as well.

I therefore posit a new hypothesis that the fundamental attractive force we know as Newtonian gravity exists contrary to Einsteins claim, snd thos force is not an intrinsic property of mass alone, but is entirely and continuously generated by the interaction of mass with the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation field in a process I call the gravitization of mass by the CMB!

Core Idea: I hypothesize that the phenomenon known as Newtonian gravity—the attractive force of mass—is the direct and continuous result of "gravitization," a process where every particle of mass in the universe is constantly being "activated" or "energized" by its pervasive interaction with the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation field, thereby creating a gravitational field of that mass. Without the CMB, mass would be gravitationally inert, and thus all gravitational pull is a product of this "gravitization" by the CMB, in a process similar to magnetization.

Relevant Properties of the CMB Radiation Field.

- Omnipresent, Uniform Energy Field: The CMB is conceptualized as a universal, massless energy wave field that completely fills all space and permeates all mas. The relevant property of this field (e.g., its average energy density) is sufficiently uniform and stable across the cosmos to account for the constancy of the gravitational force.

- Continuous Interaction: The CMB is not merely a background; it is in constant, dynamic interaction with all fundamental particles, with the strength of this interaction influenced by the mass’s density.

Proposed New Concepts.

- "Gravitization Field" (\(\mathcal{G}_{CMB}\)): We propose that the CMB itself constitutes a fundamental field responsible for conferring upon mass the ability to attract other mass (a gravitational force field). The CMB is not the force field, but an enabling energy field.

- Mass’s "Gravitized Response": Every unit of mass possesses an inherent "response" property, modulated by its density. When immersed in the CMB, mass undergoes a continuous internal gravitization process that transforms it from a gravitationally neutral state to a "gravitized" state, enabling it to exert gravitational force from a center of gravity. The force depends on the mass’s density and its size.

- CMB-Mediated Gravitational Potential: The gravitational potential of a mass is not an inherent emanation but a localized "gravitization response." This CMB influenc on mass mediates the attractive force.

Mechanism of "Gravitization" and the Origin of Newtonian Gravity.

- Universal Activation by the CMB: Every single particle of mass, from a fundamental quark to a galaxy, is perpetually immersed in and interacts with the omnipresent CMB. This continuous interaction activates the capacity of mass to generate a gravitational field and to be affected by other gravitational fields from other mass. This "activation" is the process of "gravitization," with its strength proportional to the mass’s density.

- The Generation of "Gravitational Power": A gravitized mass, by virtue of its continuous interaction with the CMB, becomes a localized source of "gravitational pull." The field of this pull attracts other mass, particles and photons towards the center of gravity of the body, and the strength of this pull is defined by the subtle modulations of the CMB on the body’s mass distribution.

- CMB as the Medium of Interaction: When two "gravitized" masses (\(m_1\) and \(m_2\)) are present, their attractive interaction is not an action-at-a-distance through empty space. Instead, the CMB acts as the sole and continuous medium through which the "gravitational pull" from one mass influences the other.

  - The inverse-square law (\(1/r^2\)) for the gravitational force arises naturally because the gravitational pull originating from a gravitized mass, spreads uniformly outwards in four dimensions. The strength of this "gravitational influence" diminishes with the square of the distance.

- The Gravitational Constant (\(G\)): The Newtonian gravitational constant \(G\) is not a fundamental property of mass, but rather a universal constant that emanates the efficiency of the CMB in gravitizing mass and producing the resulting gravitational attraction.

- All Gravity is a peoduct of Gravitization: The attractive force \( F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2} \) is, in its entirety, the observed manifestation of "gravitization" by the CMB. There is no separate, inherent gravitational property; all gravity is induced by the CMB.

How This Addresses the Gravitational Pull:

In this hypothesis, the gravitational pull we measure and observe in everyday Newtonian physics is a product of CMB "gravitization." It’s the explanation for why gravity exists at all. Mass, by itself, would be gravitationally inert if not for the CMB.

Establishing A Formula

We hereby establish a universal formula that predicts the gravitational pull of a mass based on its interaction with the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), adjusted for the mass’s internal density. We posit that the gravitational acceleration (g) is directly linked to the amount of CMB energy absorbed (\(P_{CMB}\)), modulated by the mass’s density relative to a reference density.

Understanding the Components:

- Gravitational Pull (g): As per Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation, the gravitational acceleration at the surface of a celestial body is given by:

- Hypothetical CMB Energy Absorbed (\(P_{CMB}\)):

Deriving the Formula:

Our goal is to relate \(P_{CMB}\) to the gravitational pull (\(g\)) and mass (\(M\)), accounting for density:

Define the hypothetical constant:

C = 4 \pi \times (6.674 \times 10^{-11}) \times (5.67 \times 10^{-8}) \times (2.725)^4 \approx 2.623 \times 10^{-15} \, \text{N W}/\text{kg}

Thus, the formula is:

This formula states that the CMB energy interaction required to produce a given gravitational pull is proportional to the mass (M), inversely proportional to the gravitational acceleration (g), and scaled by the relative density (\(\frac{\rho}{\langle \rho \rangle}\)). The density factor accounts for internal structure, such as hollowness, where a lower density results in reduced \(P_{CMB}\).

Verification of the Formula:

We verify the formula using known data for Earth, Moon, and Mars, incorporating their densities relative to Earth’s (\(\langle \rho \rangle = 5514 \, \text{kg/m}^3\)).

Verification Table:

Verification:

The predicted \(P_{CMB}\) values are consistent with the hypothesis, showing that \(P_{CMB}\) scales with mass and is modulated by density. For Earth, \(\frac{\rho}{\langle \rho \rangle} = 1\), ensuring consistency for a solid body. For the Moon and Mars, lower densities ratios (\(0.606\) and \(0.713\), respectively) reduce \(P_{CMB}\), reflecting less CMB interaction due to lower internal mass density. For hollow bodies, a lower \(\rho\) would further reduce \(P_{CMB}\), indicating reduced gravitization.

Implications and Potential Tests:

- Absence of CMB Implies Absence of Gravity: This theory posits that in a hypothetical universe devoid of the CMB, mass would not exert or experience gravity.

- Density-Dependent Gravitational Variations: The density factor (\(\frac{\rho}{\langle \rho \rangle}\)) suggests gravitational effects vary with internal structure. A hollow body with lower density would produce less gravitational pull, a phenomenon that could be detectable in precise gravitational measurements.

- CMB Absorption Effects: If mass absorbs CMB differently based on density, experiments near dense or hollow objects should reveal subtle changes in gravitational force.

- Testing Hollowness: The formula allows detection of hollowness by comparing \(P_{CMB}\) values. A hollow body with lower density yields a lower \(g\), indicating reduced gravitization due to less internal mass interacting with the CMB.

This hypothesis redefines gravity as an induced phenomenon dependent on the CMB and a mass’s internal density, moving away from an intrinsic property of mass or SpaceTime curvature. The formula provides a framework for exploring how the CMB mediates gravitational attraction.